OruxMaps

Quote from: sergio2Hi,



I recorded 2 hiking tracks on offline maps with OruxMaps.

In both cases total ascents are more than 1 half undervalued ! (200 m instead of 400 m for example).

What's up ?

Quote from: orux

Quote from: sergio2Hi,



I recorded 2 hiking tracks on offline maps with OruxMaps.

In both cases total ascents are more than 1 half undervalued ! (200 m instead of 400 m for example).

What's up ?

Hi,



It is a value very difficult to calculate;



If you send me a gpx with a file, I can see where is the problem,



orux

Quote from: sergio2

Quote from: orux

Quote from: sergio2Hi,



I recorded 2 hiking tracks on offline maps with OruxMaps.

In both cases total ascents are more than 1 half undervalued ! (200 m instead of 400 m for example).

What's up ?

Hi,



It is a value very difficult to calculate;



If you send me a gpx with a file, I can see where is the problem,



orux

Thank you for your answer.

Here's two .gpx files recorded with OruxMaps.



http://www99.zippyshare.com/v/sHidHFCn/file.html



In the first track, given total ascent is 645 m (real is close to 900 m).

In the second, given total ascent is 193 m (real is close to 400 m).

Quote from: orux

Quote from: sergio2

Quote from: orux


Hi,



It is a value very difficult to calculate;



If you send me a gpx with a file, I can see where is the problem,



orux

Thank you for your answer.

Here's two .gpx files recorded with OruxMaps.



http://www99.zippyshare.com/v/sHidHFCn/file.html



In the first track, given total ascent is 645 m (real is close to 900 m).

In the second, given total ascent is 193 m (real is close to 400 m).

Hello;



why do you see that real value (1st track) is near 900m? Have you uploaded that track to another app/website to test those values?





orux